Wednesday, November 16, 2005
MAKING MY CASE FOR ME
MORE ON WMD'S
Linked through Orbusmax we have this excellent article from Frontpage Magazine. It's an interview with Bill Tierney, a widely known and much respected voice on the subject.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=20154
Wonky but very much worth it. He adds great detail to many of the points I made yesterday.
However, while he mentions the Syrian connection, he stops short of claiming that's where the weapons are - or were.
Almost three years. If the Syrians ended up with significant quantities of the weapons, they have had almost three years to hide or disperse them.
Praying yet?
THEN THERE'S THE INVERTERBRATE-IN-CHIEF...
Via Jerusalem Post from AP:
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1132053866236&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
Bill Clinton is insisting - that is, insisting for the moment - that the Iraq invasion was a big mistake. "It was a big mistake. The American government made several errors ... one of which is how easy it would be to get rid of Saddam and how hard it would be to unite the country."
Nice to have you aboard, Willie. A lot of us thought the real problem would be the peace. But I don't recall you saying this in 2003... or 2002... And certainly not when you were in the hotseat.
Then again, when Slick Willie was President, did he ever take a firm position on anything?
Not that I can recall... Not even on Monica...
AND NEWSMAX IS LOOKING UNDER THE BED AGAIN...
"New Documents Reveal Saddam Hid WMD, Was Tied to Al Qaida"
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/11/16/122915.shtml
The article is a tease for the 11/21/05 issue of The Weekly Standard. We're led to expect some real meat this time.
We'll see. Maybe this won't be another re-hashing of copies of the same old paperwork. So far, we have far more pounds of paper about WMD's than we have pounds of actual WMD's...
And I can't imagine how anyone could claim that isn't a good thing.
Linked through Orbusmax we have this excellent article from Frontpage Magazine. It's an interview with Bill Tierney, a widely known and much respected voice on the subject.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=20154
Wonky but very much worth it. He adds great detail to many of the points I made yesterday.
However, while he mentions the Syrian connection, he stops short of claiming that's where the weapons are - or were.
Almost three years. If the Syrians ended up with significant quantities of the weapons, they have had almost three years to hide or disperse them.
Praying yet?
THEN THERE'S THE INVERTERBRATE-IN-CHIEF...
Via Jerusalem Post from AP:
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1132053866236&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
Bill Clinton is insisting - that is, insisting for the moment - that the Iraq invasion was a big mistake. "It was a big mistake. The American government made several errors ... one of which is how easy it would be to get rid of Saddam and how hard it would be to unite the country."
Nice to have you aboard, Willie. A lot of us thought the real problem would be the peace. But I don't recall you saying this in 2003... or 2002... And certainly not when you were in the hotseat.
Then again, when Slick Willie was President, did he ever take a firm position on anything?
Not that I can recall... Not even on Monica...
AND NEWSMAX IS LOOKING UNDER THE BED AGAIN...
"New Documents Reveal Saddam Hid WMD, Was Tied to Al Qaida"
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/11/16/122915.shtml
The article is a tease for the 11/21/05 issue of The Weekly Standard. We're led to expect some real meat this time.
We'll see. Maybe this won't be another re-hashing of copies of the same old paperwork. So far, we have far more pounds of paper about WMD's than we have pounds of actual WMD's...
And I can't imagine how anyone could claim that isn't a good thing.
